Best Managed Mobility Services Providers for Enterprise


Evaluating MMS providers requires looking beyond marketing claims to assess how each provider actually delivers services. The key evaluation dimensions are:
Mindglobal provides fully managed mobility services as part of an integrated telecom expense management and MMS program. Unlike providers that offer software with professional services bolted on, Mindglobal’s model assigns dedicated analysts to each client account — taking operational ownership of the mobile fleet rather than providing tools for the client to manage themselves.
Mindglobal’s MMS services cover the complete device lifecycle: procurement and carrier management, device provisioning and MDM integration, ongoing plan optimization, employee support, device refresh planning, and end-of-life disposition. Mindglobal is carrier-agnostic and works with all major US wireless carriers.
The key differentiator is integration: Mindglobal manages both fixed telecom expenses and mobile fleet management through a single program, providing complete visibility into enterprise communications spending from a single point of accountability. This eliminates the gaps and coordination challenges that arise when TEM and MMS are managed by separate vendors.
Best for: Mid-market and enterprise organizations seeking a fully managed service with a dedicated team, carrier-agnostic flexibility, and integrated TEM + MMS capabilities.
Tangoe offers enterprise mobility management as part of its broader TEM platform. Tangoe’s scale and extensive carrier integrations make it a strong option for very large enterprises with complex, global mobility environments. The platform is feature-rich, though its complexity can extend implementation timelines and require significant IT resources to maintain.
Best for: Very large enterprises with complex global requirements and significant IT resources to support platform management.
Calero provides managed mobility services as part of its enterprise communications management platform. Calero’s strength is in platform integration — its software connects to a wide range of carrier systems and MDM platforms. The managed service model requires active client engagement, making it better suited for organizations with some internal mobility management capability.
Best for: Enterprises with existing mobility management capabilities looking for a platform to consolidate and automate operations.
Major wireless carriers offer their own managed mobility programs that can simplify management for enterprises concentrated on a single network. The primary limitation is carrier dependency — these programs are optimized for their own network and may not provide the objectivity needed for multi-carrier optimization or negotiations.
Best for: Organizations with minimal carrier diversity that prefer managing mobility directly through their primary carrier relationship.
Large technology services firms offer managed mobility as part of broader IT outsourcing programs. These providers excel at global scale and complex integration projects, though their MMS capabilities may be one component of a larger managed services contract rather than a specialized mobility management focus.
Best for: Very large global enterprises seeking to consolidate mobility management within a broader IT managed services relationship.
| Provider | Model | Carrier Agnostic | TEM Integration | Best Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindglobal | Fully managed | Yes | Integrated | Mid-market/Enterprise |
| Tangoe | Platform + services | Yes | Yes | Large enterprise |
| Calero | Platform + services | Yes | Yes | Enterprise |
| Verizon Business | Carrier program | No | Limited | Single-carrier orgs |
Carrier MMS programs are offered by the wireless carrier and are optimized for their own network. Independent MMS providers like Mindglobal are carrier-agnostic — they work with any carrier and provide objective recommendations based on what is best for the enterprise, including multi-carrier optimization and competitive carrier negotiations.
Most MMS providers price on a per-device per-month basis, with rates varying based on the scope of services included. Some providers offer tiered pricing based on volume. Fully managed services typically command a premium over software-only platforms, but the operational savings and reduced internal resource requirements typically more than offset the price difference.
Request a demonstration of the platform, ask for references from clients of similar size and complexity, understand specifically how the managed service model works (who handles day-to-day operations), and ask each provider to quantify the savings they have delivered for comparable clients. A good MMS provider should be able to provide specific, verified savings examples rather than general estimates.